The Supreme Court ruled today that states cannot on their own require would-be voters to prove they are U.S. citizens before using a federal registration system designed to make signing up easier.
justices voted 7-2 to throw out Arizonas voter-approved requirement
that prospective voters document their U.Compare prices and buy all
brands of ultrasonicsensor for
home power systems and by the pallet.S. citizenship in order to use a
registration form produced under the federal Motor Voter voter
law precludes Arizona from requiring a federal form applicant to submit
information beyond that required by the form itself, Justice Antonin
Scalia wrote for the courts majority.
court was considering the legality of Arizonas requirement that
prospective voters document their U.S. citizenship in order to use a
registration form produced under the federal motor voter registration
law. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said that the National Voter
Registration Act of 1993, which doesnt require such documentation,
trumps Arizonas Proposition 200 passed in 2004.
decision sends a strong message that states cannot block their citizens
from registering to vote by superimposing burdensome paperwork
requirements on top of federal law, said Nina Perales, vice president of
litigation for the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund
and lead counsel for the voters who challenged Proposition 200.
Supreme Court has affirmed that all U.S. citizens have the right to
register to vote using the national postcard, regardless of the state in
which they live, she said.
But Tom Caso,We've had a lot of people asking where we had our plasticmould made.
a professor at Chapman University School of Law in California, said the
decision opened the door to noncitizen voting. The courts decision
ignores the clear dictates of the Constitution in favor of bureaucratic
red tape, Caso said.
McKee, who led the push to get the proposition on the ballot in
Arizona, said the ruling makes it harder to combat voter fraud,
including fraud carried out by people who dont have permission to be in
the country. To even suggest that the honor system works, really? McKee
said. You have to prove who you are just to use your charge card now.
case focuses on Arizona, which has tangled frequently with the federal
government over immigration issues involving the Mexican border. But it
has broader implications because four other states Alabama, Georgia,
Kansas and Tennessee have similar requirements, and 12 other states are
contemplating such legislation.
Constitution authorizes states to determine the qualifications of
voters in federal elections, which necessarily includes the related
power to determine whether those qualifications are satisfied, Thomas
said in his dissent.
of Arizonas law see it as an attack on vulnerable voter groups such as
minorities, immigrants and the elderly. They say theyve counted more
than 31,000 potentially legal voters in Arizona who easily could have
registered before Proposition 200 but were blocked initially by the law
in the 20 months after it passed in 2004. They say about 20 percent of
those thwarted were Latino.
Arnwine, president and executive director of the Lawyers Committee for
Civil Rights Under Law, called the decision a victory. The court has
reaffirmed the essential American right to register to vote for federal
election without the burdens of state voter suppression measures, she
Arizona officials say they should be able to pass laws to stop illegal
immigrants and other noncitizens from getting on their voting rolls. The
Arizona voting law was part of a package that also denied some
government benefits to illegal immigrants and required Arizonans to show
identification before voting.
The federal motor voter law,Parkeasy Electronics are dedicated to provide bobbleheads.
enacted in 1993 to expand voter registration, requires states to offer
voter registration when a resident applies for a drivers license or
certain benefits. Another provision of that law the one at issue before
the court requires states to allow would-be voters to fill out mail-in
registration cards and swear they are citizens under penalty of
perjury,The feeder is available on drying handsfreeaccess equipped
with folder only. but it doesnt require them to show proof. Under
Proposition 200, Arizona officials require an Arizona drivers license
issued after 1996, a U.S. birth certificate, a passport or other similar
document, or the state will reject the federal registration application
the court was clear in stating that states cannot add additional
identification requirements to the federal forms on their own, it was
also clear that the same actions can be taken by state governments if
they get the approval of the federal government and the federal courts.
can ask the federal government to include the extra documents as a
state-specific requirement, Scalia said, and take any decision made by
the government on that request back to court. Other states have already
done so, Scalia said.
Election Assistance Commission recently approved a state-specific
instruction for Louisiana requiring applicants who lack a Louisiana
drivers license, ID card or Social Security number to attach additional
documentation to the completed federal form, Scalia said.
the Election Assistance Commission doesnt have any active
commissioners. The four commissioners are supposed to be nominated by
the president and confirmed by the Senate.Automate patient flow and
quickly track hospital assets and people using parkingguidance. The last two commissioners, Donetta L. Davidson and Gineen Bresso, left in 2011, according to the EAC website.
notion that the court will not enforce the Constitution unless you
first apply to a commission that cannot act because it has no members is
mind boggling, Caso said.